Future of Interoperability Standards Meeting 2010

From CETISwiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Tagging:

Contents

Reports and Reflections on the event

Li Yuan (CETIS) has created a combined summary of the meeting and overview of the issues it discussed. This provides some of the background to the discussion and approaches it from the point of view of someone who is not "in the trenches". It is available in two formats:

Blog Posts arising from the meeting:

Draft summary of cetisfis, created immediately following the meeting.

Report in Ariadne by Sarah Currier

Position Papers

Participants are invited to submit brief position papers ahead of the meeting for consideration and discussion at the meeting; this is intended to enable us to focus less on presentations and have more time for discussion.

You can submit papers directly by email to scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com

Notes from plenary

)

Agenda

10.00 - 10.30 Coffee and registration

10.30 - 10.45 Round table introductions: who are you, who do you represent, why are you here, what’s your background in all this?

10.45 - 11.00 Introduction, aims and objectives - Adam Cooper, CETIS Director

11.00 - 12.00 Plenary discussion: What would you most like to improve about interoperability standards in education?

12.00 - 13.00 Group activity: How can the relationship between formal and informal standards bodies address the issues identified in the plenary discussion? What are the potential benefits of involving informal standards development initiatives in the system. Can you identify ways forward from the position papers. Each group to identify the following and produce a single statement of agreement:

The final output should be a concise statement that the whole group subscribes to.

13.00 - 14.00 Lunch

14.00 - 15.00 Plenary synthesis of group statements:


15.00 - 16.00 What next? What activities would it be useful for CETIS to facilitate? E.g. bi-partisan meetings, spec development work, potential future meetings.


(On the previous day, CETIS are hosting the 40th meeting of the CEN WS-LT.)

Task

Identify the following and produce a single statement of agreement:

The final output should be a concise statement that the whole group subscribes to.