Talk:LEAP as Atom

Personally, I don't think that a tag as a category would work for LEAP 2.0. Simon 14:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) we need user-defined tags, which should be in line, not defined elsewhere
 * 2) tags need to be related to in many ways, not just as labels for things

However, see this post which gives useful argument. The resolution, as I see it at present, is that we use categories for referring to tags, or for stating non-scheme tags. There can be an internal scheme for interests, an internal scheme for abilities, and an internal scheme for personalities, where the term comes from the internal definition. More often, though, the scheme will be external, and nothing need be represented directly in the portfolio information beyond the category.--Simon 15:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)